North Atlantic Terrorist Organization
Kosher Douchebags, Shabbos Goy Butt Plugs...
I retort, you deride . . . Get ready for the next big stab in the back to America coming any day now from U.S. House Speaker Mike Pelosi, or was that, Nancy Johnson? I can’t really tell the difference anymore.
Watch the Tucker Carlson interview with Marjorie Taylor Greene below . . . see what Hillary Clinton says about Ukraine . . . Mike Johnson (R-LA) is about to deliver Hillary's next big stab in the back to America . . . Is he being blackmailed? Is there some video out there, or some young intern (male or female) cued up and ready to sing? . . . Johnson’s hair is just too perfect, ala Marv Albert . . . if you know what I mean . . . there are a lot of political cross-dressers in D.C. and closeted weirdos wearing women’s lingerie . . .
“Our manly ways and stern simplicity wreak much confusion to the enemy's councils. For they are men yet garb themselves as women, wearing wigs and finery and lace.” ― Oliver Cromwell
Say what you like about Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), she has the spirit of a real Viking shield maiden, she is absolutely fearless and doesn’t pee all over herself when facing confrontations like a lot of her limp-wristed, feminized male colleagues do.
Obviously, the only ones who benefit from Republican control of Congress are the Democrats, because Republicans fought tooth and nail to keep the border invasion flowing smoothly and let the Democrats run the hearings and special council investigations of Donald Trump despite having both chambers.
In the Beslan attack on a Russian school on 9-1-2004, masked men and women, wearing bomb belts, burst into Beslan's School Number One, opening fire in the courtyard as a ceremony marking the beginning of the school year was finishing.
Islamic terrorists took more than 1,200 hostages, mostly children . . . The hostages were crammed into their school sports hall beneath explosives strung from the basketball hoops. Their captors were demanding Russian troops pull out of Chechnya.
More than 330 hostages including 186 children died in the Russian rescue effort, but the European Court of Human Rights decided that the Russian authorities had violated European human rights law and that terrorist attacks on Russians are just fine by them.
Fast forward to 5-13-2005, Andijan, Uzbekistan . . . Heavily armed Islamist terrorists stormed a prison, took local officials hostage, killing some of them. They were demanding the release of an extremist group accused of seeking an Islamist caliphate in Eastern Uzbekistan.
Before long, the Uzbek government forces put an end to the situation in a firefight, innocent bystanders and human shields used by the terrorists were also killed in the battle.
Despite Russia’s displeasure with it, Uzbek President Islam Karimov was allowing the United States to use his Karshi-Khanabad airfield to supply American forces in Afghanistan.
Same story as Beslan, human rights activists started blaming the Uzbeki government of violating the human rights of terrorists. Despite video evidence showing the attackers heavily armed, Human Rights Watch declared them to be peaceful protestors, like the ones burning down American cities and rioting in 2019.
Two weeks after the attack, U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-NC), pictured above with the slimy subway Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), travelled to the Uzbek capital of Tashkent to deliver a public rebuke to Uzbeks for killing their beloved terrorist brethren.
Fast forward to 8-20-2022 . . . Alexander Dugin and his daughter, Darya Dugina . . . Civilians, deliberately targeted with a car bomb by the Jewish terrorist regime in Ukraine, headed by Israeli operative Volodymyr Zelensky.
Despite Israeli terrorist Zelensky cancelling the Ukrainian elections, Ukraine is supposedly still a democratic country, whose popular president was elected, in a free and fair election, and Ukraine is completely justified committing terrorist attacks targeting Russian civilians because Russians have been deemed to be fascist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic, antisemitic, holocaust deniers by Jewish terrorists and the kike-sucking Zionist ass-whores of the North Atlantic Transgender Organization.
Fast forward again to the Crocus City Hall music venue 3-23-2024 . . . they didn’t waste a minute to make demands this time, they just started killing Russians . . . The four men accused of the deadly terror attack were quickly identified by Russian authorities as being from Tajikistan, a former Soviet republic in Central Asia.
US National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson, said in a statement that . . . “ISIS bears sole responsibility for this attack. There was no Ukrainian involvement whatsoever.”
Israeli Secret Intelligence Service… North Atlantic Terrorist Organization…?
I retort, you deride…
The U.S. State Dept. has been infested with communists since WW1 and Woodrow Wilson, they tried to steal the Russian elections for their comrades in the Russian Communist Party through non-profit NGOs . . . just like at home in America . . . But Vladimir Putin defeated them, so they launched a faggot jihad against the Russian Orthodox church over the punk rock band and the Olympics . . . something Mitt Romney stupidly piled onto . . . Miss neo-kabbalah lesbian Madonna, now rumored to be a Muslim convert, was flown in to agitate when Hillary went on a world-wide gay pride tour . . . And while Leon Puñettas (sic) was busy with gay pride celebrations at the Pentagon, two Navy Seals, a U.S. Airman, and a U.S. Ambassador were murdered . . . all because everyone was being so fucking gay.
When the Iron Curtain fell down the Bolshevik Jews all fled to the other side because they knew what the Russians would do to them after 100 years of communism. The best thing about Russia getting Crimea back . . . Catherine the Great took it from the Turks . . . What happened right after Russia retook Crimea? The Russian FSB searched all the Turks living there . . . Why? Because NATO sponsors Islamist terrorism when it suits them to . . .
The Podesta Group was paying Hosni Mubarak about 1.3 million dollars a year, they also rigged the Egyptian election for the Muslim Brotherhood’s now deposed Mohammed Morsi . . . reactions to the subsequent crack down on non-profit N.G.O.s by both the Egyptian and Russian governments should have been enough to implicate the real election hackers . . . HINT: they weren’t Russian.
The recently ousted Speaker of the US House of Representatives, former Congressman Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who took a dozen votes to get elected speaker, traveled to Israel immediately upon his election, declaring to the Israeli Knesset that the USA is steadfastly committed to supporting Ukraine in their war against Russia . . .
Was he running for speaker of the Israeli Knesset too?
Following his ouster . . . McCarthy (R-CA) traveled abroad again, this time to England, and expressed his open contempt for the white Republicans who make up the majority of the GOP and praised Democrats for their diversity during a debate at Oxford in the wake of his ouster as House Speaker . . .
Is he now running for the Prime Minister of the U.K.?
Nevertheless, he is free to go on media tours bashing white people and lobbying for Israel, because he has resigned from the US House of Representatives . . . I can only conclude that the collective RINO butthurt over former Speaker McCarthy is all about the Israelis who have hijacked the American deep state war machine.
It has become so painfully obvious, especially where you have someone like Nikki Haley wagging her finger and shouting down Vivek Ramaswamy in a presidential debate on live national television when the questions of this Ukrainian war against Russia and any mention of Israel are concerned, that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Committee.
Air Force Chief of Staff Charles Q. Brown Jr. has been confirmed as the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and will take over on Oct. 1 to replace the traitor, General Mark A. Milley, who is resigning in disgrace.
While choosing officers by any racial category rather than merit is illegal under civil rights legislation, Charlie Brown Jr.’s quotas limit the number of white officers to 67% and cut white men down to 43% in the US Airforce.
In what the late Saddam Hussein once dubbed “the great Satan,” roughly two-thirds of the United States enlisted military corps is white . . .
The fat, bulbous U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin once confirmed in a 93-2 vote of the U.S. Senate, immediately embarked on a whirlwind media tour of duty, telling the pseudo-secular sycophants in the state-controlled tabloid press and state-controlled television talk show circuit about how the U.S. Army is full of bad racist white men.
Senior Defense Department leaders celebrating yet another Pride Month at the Pentagon sounding the alarm about the rising number of state laws they say target the LGBTQ+ community, warned the trend is hurting the feelings of the armed forces.
“LGBTQ plus and other diverse communities are under attack, just because they are different. Hate for hate’s sake,” said Gil Cisneros, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for personnel and readiness, who also serves as DoD’s chief diversity and inclusion officer.
Erstwhile Muslims Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), have every right to say what they like about Israel and the genocide of Palestinians as elected members of the US House of Representatives; they never took an oath to serve Israel . . . or, did they?
Former US lawmaker Cynthia McKinney (D-TX) said every candidate for Congress has to sign a pledge to support Israel:
The hypocritical lofty principles of U.S. House Resolution 845 to censure Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) for supposedly promoting false narratives should be applied across the whole of the United States Congress, especially with the false narratives about Russia and Ukraine, which could endanger the entire planet with a thermonuclear war . . . Volodymyr Zelensky is an Israeli operative and is being protected by the British SAS.
Likewise, Ilhan Omar (D-MN) being called to the carpet (or prayer rug) for intimating she represented Somali interests’ kind of rings hollow when the rest of Congress represents Israeli interests and the security of every other border on the planet but those of the United States . . .
The Muslims are only doing what the Israelites have taught them for the last 3000 years, it is written right in the Jewish Torah . . .
“You shall put all of the males to the sword. You may, however, take as your booty the women, the children and the livestock, and everything in the town – all of its spoil – and enjoy the use of the spoil of your enemy which the Lord gives unto you.” — Deuteronomy 20:13
Kikesucking Zionist Ass-Whores, Fight Your Own Wars...
“I fear the Jewish bankers with their craftiness and torturous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos so that the earth should become their inheritance.” ― Otto Von Bismark
Occidental Observer:
The Jewish Security Shakedown
April 8, 2024/3 Comments/in Featured Articles, Jewish Influence, Jews as An Elite/by Marshall Yeats
“Chase after money and security, and your heart will never unclench.”
Tao Te Ching
“The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (Orthodox Union), the nation’s largest Orthodox Jewish umbrella organization, applauded Senator Chuck Schumer’s ambitious proposal to allocate $1 billion to Jewish community security through the Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP).”
Orthodox Union Advocacy Center, November 6 2023
Jewish activism throughout the West follows very similar broad patterns, including a noticeable over-representation in pro-immigration and pro-diversity movements, and in other areas which can be classed as demographically and culturally aggressive and harmful to the interests of the native population. An ancillary pattern to this activism is a strident defensiveness that borders on paranoia, resulting in Jews taking leading roles in the restriction of free speech, the introduction of “hate” laws and, finally, a strident and insatiable demand that the host population, the very subject of Jewish aggression, provide funds for the physical security of Jews.
The Security Shakedown in Historical Context
The Jewish demand for special protection is witnessed throughout the history of their settlement among Europeans. In the Middle Ages, European elites were aware of the hostility aroused by Jewish exploitation of the peasantry but, because they also benefited from this exploitation via special taxes on Jews, numerous measures were taken to increase security for Jewish usurers and their families. The now infamous “identifying badge,” normally a yellow star, originates from the thirteenth century, when it was first introduced to better facilitate the recognition of Jews by their official bodyguards.[1] Writing in The Jews in 1922, Hilaire Belloc pointed out that after the Enlightenment and the decline of absolute monarchies, Jews seized upon ‘citizenship’ as a replacement for the security and protection offered by the now redundant symbiotic relationship with the older, weakened elites of yesterday. ‘Equality under the law,’ or rather the unequal application of this principle, was the path to the security and special treatment which, as Belloc argued, ‘the Jew’ feels “to be his due.” Belloc wrote:
Without it [the Jew] feels handicapped. He is, in his own view, only saved from the disadvantage of a latent hostility when he is thus protected, and he is therefore convinced that the world owes him this singular privilege of full citizenship in any community where he happens for the moment to be, while at the same time retaining full citizenship of his own nation. … What the Jew wanted was not the proud privilege of being called an Englishman, a Frenchman, an Italian, or a Dutchman. To this he was completely indifferent. What the Jew wanted was not the feeling that he was just like the others — that would have been odious to him — what he wanted was security. (The Jews, p. 26).
Andrew Joyce, reviewing Belloc’s work, comments:
Belloc raises an interesting point: the incessant search of Jews for security remains a stark but often overlooked reality in the present. The rise of the National Socialists, and the wave of pent-up exasperation which swept through Europe during World War II, revealed to Jews the weakness of citizenship, in and of itself, to maintain the fiction of equality and to offer the deep level of security they crave. Confronted with a mass expression of European ethnocentrism, the Jew could find no appropriate mask. Not one of religion, for the guise of ‘Christian’ no longer offered protection and the opportunity of crypsis. The state now comprised a citizenry of racial brothers rather than ‘fellow citizens’ of the Jews. For the first time in the long game of musical chairs they had played since arriving in Europe, the music had stopped playing — and the Jews were left without a chair. From the rubble of World War II, a new world was to be fashioned. No longer was citizenship for the Jews enough — now Jewish security was to be sought by regulating non-Jews and imposing limits on the exercise of their citizenship. Since World War II this has taken the form of everything from engineering the demographic profile of Western nations, to ‘hate speech’ laws and lobbying for gun control.
A New Protection Racket
Administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) is currently one of the most significant legal methods for wealth and resource transfer from non-Jews to Jews in the United States. Originally proposed by the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) in December 2001, the NSGP has given over $1.1 billion in taxpayers’ money to Jewish groups, with the stated goal of protecting synagogues and schools.
The almost exclusively Jewish destination of NSGP funds is only very lightly disguised. FEMA state that “the Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) provides funding support for target hardening and other physical security enhancements and activities to nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of terrorist attack. The intent is to integrate nonprofit preparedness activities with broader state and local preparedness efforts. It is also designed to promote coordination and collaboration in emergency preparedness activities among public and private community representatives, as well as state and local government agencies. [emphasis added]” Publicly available financial disclosures have shown that the Jewish share of distributed funds is so large as to surely demand special mention. In 2009, Jewish groups received 60% of funds, in 2007 73%, by 2011 this had increased to 81%, 97% in 2012, 90% in 2013, and Jews received $11 million of the $13.8 million distributed in 2014. NSGP is a program devised by Jews to benefit Jews.
Realizing that they’d hit a rich vein of lucrative funds, in 2020 Jewish groups began to corral other minority religious groups, especially Muslims, along with a few token churches in an effort to lobby for vastly increased funds under a more superficially diverse umbrella. But the involvement of other groups was purely tactical. According to Jewish Currents,
the security grant program had never been designed with the particular needs of Muslim communities in mind. The program was created in 2005, largely as a result of lobbying by Jewish groups, including the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA)—then known as the United Jewish Communities—and the Orthodox Union. Thanks to consistent Jewish lobbying efforts and a robust Jewish infrastructure for coaching organizations on applying for grants, the majority of funds have always been funneled toward synagogues and Jewish community organizations.
A Wikipedia entry on the NSGP contains the warning that “the program has become a popular topic among antisemitic and conspiracy-oriented bloggers, who point to information on award sizes to argue that Jewish interests have undue effect upon the American government.” This seems redundant given that Jews themselves have celebrated the NSGP as a product of their outsized power and influence in America. In 2010, the Forward published an op-ed specifically on how “the grants program provides a window into Jewish organizational and political power. It is this power that allowed a small community to create and maintain a government program tailored specifically for its needs and catering almost exclusively to its members.” At a time when the number of White victims of multiculturalism is spiraling, the Forward describes
The Akiba-Schechter Jewish Day School, in Chicago, put in new lights around its building and parking lot and now has a state-of-the-art video surveillance system with 12 cameras. Congregation Brith Shalom, in Bellaire, Texas, now has blast-proof doors and windows. In Baltimore, the Bais Hamedrash & Mesivta school installed a new gate to the parking lot and placed cameras throughout the building. Earlier this month, Congregation B’nai Israel of Staten Island put new shatterproof windows into its 40-year-old building. All thanks to the United States taxpayer.
Analysis of fund recipients revealed that the stronger the Jewish identification, the more money they consumed. For example, “Lubavitch Jews received more grants than the entire Reform movement, the largest denomination in the country. Overall, Orthodox institutions were dramatically overrepresented, receiving about 45% of the grants that went to all Jewish institutions from 2007 to 2010. … A grant was even awarded to the American Israel Education Fund, which is an offshoot of the America Israel Public Affairs Committee and holds net assets, according to its latest tax filings, of $38 million.”
The Magic Formula
The Forward points out the disproportionate benefit given to Jews “is no accident,” and that Jewish groups were involved in designing the formula for awards — a formula that will always inevitably benefit them over other groups:
The legislation and the rules defining eligibility make no mention of preferring Jewish institutions, but in practice the program could easily be viewed as a Jewish earmark. First, religious institutions are preferred over other not-for-profits. This policy is tucked into DHS’s official rules for evaluating grant applications. Each organization applying receives a score based on the merits of its request. Then the score of a “non-profit organization with religious affiliation” is multiplied by three, giving it a significant advantage over other applicants. Second, high-risk metropolitan areas are given top priority in the grant process, and those “tier 1” cities — New York, Washington, Houston, Chicago and Los Angeles — have a heavy concentration of Jews. A second tier consists of cities that face less of a risk of terror attacks, including Miami, Boston and Dallas. Philadelphia had been in that second group, but was moved to tier 1 in 2010. Lobbyists are now working for the inclusion of Rockland County, N.Y., because it is home to a dense ultra-Orthodox population. Third, an ambiguous definition of what constitutes a terror threat has enabled many Jewish institutions to make a stronger case than non-Jewish counterparts. The criteria established by Congress and DHS requires not-for-profits to demonstrate that they “or closely related organizations (within or outside the U.S.)” have been subjected to prior threats or attacks by a terrorist network. Taking into account incidents overseas allows Jewish groups to describe their threat level regardless of what is happening in their own communities. Several Chabad synagogues contacted by the Forward mentioned the November 2008 attack against the Chabad house in Mumbai, India, as proof of their vulnerability. Other applicants pointed to terror attacks against Jewish targets in Israel as justification for the government funding. … Since September 11, 2001, the United States has foiled nearly three dozen credible terror plots, and more than 170 terror suspects have been arrested. The Jewish community was targeted directly in only a handful of these attempts. … Jewish groups, however, have a different count. They include the July 2006 shooting rampage at the Jewish federation building in Seattle, which left one person dead, and the July 2010 attack on Washington’s United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, which took the life of a security guard. Both of these incidents were described by law enforcement authorities as hate crimes, not terror attacks. The perpetrators — one a Muslim, the other a white Christian — were not affiliated with a terror network and did not carry out the attacks as part of a broader agenda. … Yet, Beth Jacob Congregation, in Beverly Hills, cited the Seattle incident as the reason that it needed federal funding for security.
You read that correctly. An attack on Jews anywhere in the world, like India or Israel (!), will result in them getting more funds in the U.S. And these funds are being used simply to make Jewish lives more comfortable, like insulating them from multicultural crime or improving their properties. The Forward article explains:
In conversations with leaders of dozens of synagogues and other Jewish organizations around the country, the Forward found that combating crime, not preventing terrorism, was the prime motivation to apply for the federal money. “We had been thinking for a long time about upgrading our security, not really because of any particular issue,” said Rabbi Adam Zeff of the Germantown Jewish Centre, in Philadelphia. “There were some incidents that we found that we were unable to deal with — people getting into the building, vandalism on our playground. The homeland security grant was important to us because it expanded our vision of what we could do.” A similar view was expressed by Hanna Belsky, administrator of Chicago’s Hanna Sacks Bais Yaakov High School. “There have been incidents like a broken window, somebody getting in the school,” she said. “Our parking lot is open to the street, and now with the money, it’s a private parking lot. … This was our dream.”
In 2021 the drive to add a superficial diversity to the grant program profile was successful in prompting gullible lawmakers to double the annual funding to the program. In 2023 it ballooned to $305 million (when the program opened, the annual budget was $15 million). Jewish groups were thrown into a panic in March of this year, however, when the Biden administration revised the funding down by 10% to $274.5 million. Although the final amount is still extravagant, Jewish groups are probably most disturbed that there was any reduction at all. The ambition is clearly to keep expanding this lucrative gravy train, with Chuck Schumer demanding that it be increased to $1 billion annually. After all, a world in which Jewish car parks are open to the street would be simply intolerable.
Jewish groups are apparently not consoled by the fact Biden’s FY2025 budget, released on March 11, proposes a record $385 million for the NSGP. Even a temporary drop is unacceptable. In a joint statement, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Jewish Federations of North America and the Orthodox Union said “these funds are not just grants; they are lifelines that have fortified vital institutions against hate and violence. The security measures these funds have supported at Jewish facilities across the country have saved lives and prevented tragedy. Together, we urge Congress to prioritize additional funding to make the NSGP program whole. Any national security supplemental must include funding for NSGP and there must be increased funding for NSGP in the FY2025 appropriations bill.” Jonathan Greenblatt was keen to maintain the ruse that the NSGP isn’t a Jewish earmark, stating that “these grants are critical to the safety and security of not only the Jewish community, but nonprofits and religious institutions around the country.”
The Security Shakedown Goes International
The tremendous success of the NSGP scam has let to its replication elsewhere. In Britain, they don’t even bother with the ruse that it’s a generalized grant for nonprofits. Just a few months ago, the UK government announced that the Jewish Community Security Trust would be allocated “more than £70 million over the next 4 years, as part of the Jewish Community Protective Security Grant.” While crime has increased 15% across Britain’s multicultural schools, Jewish schools will benefit from more security guards, improved fencing, and other measures designed to make Jews more protected and comfortable. In France, 80% of the Jewish community’s “security” needs are financially supported by taxpayers through the Délégation aux Coopérations de Sécurité. Last year, the German government increased its funding for the largest national Jewish umbrella body, Central Council of Jews in Germany, by 70%, to include “creating a nationwide training program for security personnel at Jewish institutions.”
*****
The overall picture, therefore, is that Jews will continue to disproportionately lobby for the demographic marginalization of Whites while obtaining funds from the governments of these same nations that make their lives easier, safer, and shield them from the worst effects of multiculturalism. Jews can lobby for mass migration, safe in the knowledge that even in the big cities they can live, study, and worship behind electric fencing, dozens of cameras, and 24/7 security guards — at no cost to themselves. They can park their cars in private car parks, and get more money to do so every year because someone might bump into a Jew in Mumbai, or a Palestinian might throw a rock at an IDF soldier. There is surely no greater indicator that Jews are an elite than the fact that, just as in medieval times, an assault on a Jew is viewed as something symbolic, something more than the sum of its parts. In the Middle Ages, to compromise the security of a Jew was to attack the monarchy itself. Today, to compromise the security of the Jews is to attack democracy, to abuse human rights, or some other useful abstraction. In the quote from the Tao Te Ching opening this essay, Lao Tse comments on the total lack of peace found within the soul of the person who chases money. In other translations, it is expressed as “He who hoards gold and jade will never find peace.” Jewish outsized influence brings with it an abundance of insecurity, but it’s you who picks up the tab.
[1] “The Jews of England in the Thirteenth Century,” Jewish Quarterly Review, 15:1 (1902), 5-22 (p.14).
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/04/08/the-jewish-security-shakedown/
Valdai Club
The Struggle for the Interpretation of the Crocus City Hall Tragedy
08.04.2024 . . . Andrey Sushentsov
The rational, fact-finding line that the Russian government is now taking will inevitably lead us to the point where we will know exactly who ordered this crime. We see a significant distance between how calmly and rationally (as much as is possible in this situation), the investigators of our country conducted themselves, and how our Western opponents are trying to present us with their pseudo-reality, writes Valdai Club Programme Director Andrey Sushentsov.
The United States is trying to seize the initiative in the media interpretation of the tragic terrorist attack that occurred in Russia. In the Western media space, Washington is shaping the opinion that should, by all means, remove their protégé, Ukraine, from the focus of attention. At certain points in time, ISIS (banned in Russia) has been a convenient tool for the United States in Syria. Data have been published that indicate the United States took action against the Syrian government in tandem with ISIS. The fact that Washington, from the first minutes after the Moscow terrorist attack, offered a coherent version of events is extremely paradoxical in itself.
It takes the United States decades to establish the cause of crimes within its own country, such as the assassinations of leading American political figures. They lack the resources, attention and enthusiasm to establish, even several years after the fact, who was behind the sabotage of Russian-European energy infrastructure, Nord Stream 2, but within 15 minutes they provide “accurate” information about who organised a terrorist attack in Moscow. I am convinced that the Russian government has no intention of shielding ISIS if this organisation is really behind it. Statements by the Russian President and senior officials indicate that the Russian position is based strictly on facts. They indicate that the terrorists who committed the attack were moving towards the Russian-Ukrainian border, where opportunities were provided for them to cross it.
If we continue the American line, does this mean that ISIS and the Ukrainian government are coordinating their actions? The developers of this concept must think several steps ahead about what conclusions follow from it. The United States is trying to fill the information vacuum, offers its emotional interpretation of this event in order to divert suspicion from those they need now — this is the so-called “cover operation.” When US leaders are caught off guard, and such episodes do occur, intelligence leaders often and directly admit in congressional hearings that the agencies failed to foresee a particular event. However, in the situation with the terrorist attack in Moscow, the Americans suddenly put forward a coherent version of events in 15 minutes. This reminds us how, within 24 hours after Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the 2016 American elections, charges were fabricated against Russia for involvement in the election of Donald Trump as US President.
Ukraine is not a fully autonomous actor; it offers itself as a convenient tool for the United States. Ukrainian leaders do not hide this fact in interviews with foreign media, describing their country as the best security investment for Washington, as if adopting the investment language of American leaders. The White House, in turn, is trying to convince Congress of the need to continue supporting Ukraine, describes the Ukrainian operation as a successful investment: “big returns for low costs.” Ukraine recognises that its own room for manoeuvre is shrinking and its resources are depleted. In fact, it is waging this fight “on an IV drip”: if the flow of resources dries up, then the confrontation will stop at that very moment. All that remains is gradual radicalisation, towards both its opponents and its own population. The Ukrainian line of dehumanising the opponent at different levels leads to thinking that it is becoming more and more radical, and from here it is one step to the justification of terrorist acts.
I believe that the verified, rational, fact-finding line that the Russian government is now taking will inevitably lead us to the point where we will know exactly who ordered this crime. We see a significant distance between how calmly and rationally (as much as is possible in this situation), the investigators of our country conducted themselves, and how our Western opponents are trying to present us with their pseudo-reality. The goals set by the organisers of the terrorist attack will not be achieved: one of them is a blow to the sore points of our society. However, one can notice how Russian society itself responded to this crime, as it was involved in saving people and eliminating the consequences. It is uplifting, empowering and demonstrates that our spirit cannot be broken.
Russia will achieve the stated goals of the special military operation: Ukraine will be deprived of its dangerous military potential. Russia needs to create conditions that will not allow, in possible immediate historical circumstances, a return to the balancing system where Ukraine can be used as an instrument against Russia. The open question is whether its foreign policy agency remains. We cannot predict this now, but it is obvious that Kiev is playing the role of a destructive actor throughout the Eurasian space. Ukraine does not have its own constructive goals; it does not want to prosper and survive in order to develop. Its only task in the current format is to defeat Russia, and in the event of failure, to cause as much trouble as possible.
Views expressed are of individual Members and Contributors, rather than the Club's, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/the-struggle-for-the-interpretation-of-the-crocus/
Thanks for putting out such an extensive and revealing article.