Protocol XII – Control of the Press

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

Protocol No. 12 – Control of the Press

1. The word “freedom,” which can be interpreted in various ways, is defined by us as follows –

2. Freedom is the right to do that which the law allows. This interpretation of the word will at the proper time be of service to us, because all freedom will thus be in our hands, since the laws will abolish or create only that which is desirable for us according to the aforesaid program.

3. We shall deal with the press in the following way: what is the part played by the press to-day? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed for our purpose or else it serves selfish ends of parties. It is often vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves. We shall saddle and bridle it with a tight curb: we shall do the same also with all productions of the printing press, for where would be the sense of getting rid of the attacks of the press if we remain targets for pamphlets and books? The produce of publicity, which nowadays is a source of heavy expense owing to the necessity of censoring it, will be turned by us into a very lucrative source of income to our State: we shall law on it a special stamp tax and require deposits of caution-money before permitting the establishment of any organ of the press or of printing offices; these will then have to guarantee our government against any kind of attack on the part of the press. For any attempt to attack us, if such still be possible, we shall inflict fines without mercy. Such measures as stamp tax, deposit of caution-money and fines secured by these deposits, will bring in a huge income to the government. It is true that party organs might not spare money for the sake of publicity, but these we shall shut up at the second attack upon us. No one shall with impunity lay a finger on the aureole of our government infallibility. The pretext for stopping any publication will be the alleged plea that it is agitating the public mind without occasion or justification. I BEG YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY WILL ATTACK EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE¬ DETERMINED TO ALTER.

WE CONTROL THE PRESS

4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world ….

6. Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures THE INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS. Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits …. All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest….

FREE PRESS DESTROYED

7. We turn to the periodical press. We shall impose on it, as on all printed matter, stamp taxes per sheet and deposits of caution- money, and hooks of less than 30 sheets will pay double. We shall reckon them as pamphlets in order, on the one hand, to reduce the number of magazines, which are the worst form of printed poison, and, on the other, in order that this measure may force writers into such lengthy productions that they will be little read, especially as they will be costly. At the same time what we shall publish ourselves to influence mental development in the direction laid down for our profit will be cheap and will be read voraciously. The tax will bring vapid literary ambitions within bounds and the liability to penalties will make literary men dependent upon us. And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions in print the publisher or printer will have to apply to the authorities for permission to do so. Thus we shall know beforehand of all tricks preparing against us and shall nullify them by getting ahead with explanations on the subject treated of.

8. Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of a tremendous influence upon the public mind …. If we give permits for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on in the same proportion. This, however, must in no wise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

9. In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

10. In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, off position, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions – aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical – for so long, of course, as the constitution exists …. Like the Indian idol “Vishnu” they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.

13. In order to direct our newspaper militia in this sense we must take special and minute care in organizing this matter. Under the title of central department of the press we shall institute literary gatherings at which our agents will without attracting attention issue the orders and watchwords of the day. By discussing and controverting, but always superficially, without touching the essence of the matter, our organs will carry on a sham fight fusillade with the official newspapers solely for the purpose of giving occasion for us to express ourselves more fully than could well be done from the outset in official announcements, whenever, of course, that is to our advantage.

14. THESE ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO SERVE ANOTHER PURPOSE, NAMELY, THAT OUR SUBJECTS WILL BE CONVINCED TO THE EXISTENCE OF FULL FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND SO GIVE OUR AGENTS AN OCCASION TO AFFIRM THAT ALL ORGANS WHICH OPPOSE US ARE EMPTY BABBLERS, since they are incapable of finding any substantial objections to our orders.

ONLY LIES PRINTED

15. Methods of organization like these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government. Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquilize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it…. WE SHALL HAVE A SURE TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND FINAL EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the press. We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.

16. Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, in case of need, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs.

17. Even nowadays, already, to take only the French press, there are forms which reveal masonic solidarity in acting on the watchword: all organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy; like the augurs of old, not one of their numbers will give away the secret of his sources of information unless it be resolved to make announcement of them. Not one journalist will venture to betray this secret, for not one of them is ever admitted to practice literature unless his whole past has some disgraceful sore or other …. These sores would be immediately revealed. So long as they remain the secret of a few the prestige of the journalist attacks the majority of the country – the mob follow after him with enthusiasm.

18. Our calculations are especially extended to the provinces. It is indispensable for us to inflame there those hopes and impulses with which we could at any moment fall upon the capital, and we shall represent to the capitals that these expressions are the independent hopes and impulses of the provinces. Naturally, the source of them will be always one and the same – ours. WHAT WE NEED IS THAT, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WE ARE IN THE PLENITUDE POWER, THE CAPITALS SHOULD FIND THEMSELVES STIFLED BY THE PROVINCIAL OPINION OF THE NATIONS, I.E., OF A MAJORITY ARRANGED BY OUR AGENTUR. What we need is that at the psychological moment the capitals should not be in a position to discuss an accomplished fact for the simple reason, if for no other, that it has been accepted by the public opinion of a majority in the provinces. 19. WHEN WE ARE IN THE PERIOD OF THE NEW REGIME TRANSITIONAL TO THAT OF OUR ASSUMPTION OF FULL SOVEREIGNTY WE MUST NOT ADMIT ANY REVELATION BY THE PRESS OF ANY FORM OF PUBLIC DISHONESTY; IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE NEW REGIME SHOULD BE THOUGHT TO HAVE SO PERFECTLY CONTENDED EVERYBODY THAT EVEN CRIMINALITY HAS DISAPPEARED … Cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses – no more.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/protocols-of-zion-protocol-xii-control-of-the-press/

Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution

• Författare:
  Simon Holmqvist

• E-post:
  simon.holmqvist@nordfront.se

GLOBALISM • Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen, eller Nato, är institutionellt en antivit och familjefientlig organisation. Detta vill riksdagens politiker, inklusive SD, tvinga på folket över deras huvuden.

Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.

Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.

Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.

Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.

Nato är dessutom en helt igenom feministisk krigsallians och förespråkar, likt många av dess medlemsländers regeringar, att skicka vita kvinnor till krig och strida i männens ställe. Kvinnor i militären riskerar inte bara att underprestera med tanke på deras begränsade fysik; att placera kvinnor i förband riskerar dessutom att bryta upp enigheten och brödraskapet som man vill ska uppstå bland väpnade styrkor.

Under senare tid har Nato även presenterat en lång rad rapporter om hur samhällen inte bara måste acceptera homosexuell och transsexuell degenerering, utan även omfamna detta och erbjuda dessa människor ”en stark värdighet”.

När ”internationella dagen mot homofobi, bifobi och transfobi” firades i början av juni gick Natos generalsekreterare Jens Stoltenberg ut och lovade militärt beskydd av homolobbyns agenda.

Därmed är Nato ingen beskyddare av västerlandet utan en krigsallians som aktivt bekämpar ras, familj och äktenskap – de fundament som hela den västerländska civilisationen vilar på.

Som krigsallians har Nato dessutom intagit en ledande roll i attacken på vår civilisations grundpelare. 2002 hade endast ett Nato-land legaliserat homoäktenskap, men trots detta gav Nato fullständiga förmåner åt alla homopar bland sina anställda och blev därmed en global pionjär i att jämställa dessa relationer med heterosexuella äktenskap.

Av totalt 31 Nato-länder har 17 idag helt legaliserat homosexuella ”äktenskap”, ytterligare 7 har legaliserat ”civila partnerskap” medan Slovakien och Polen har en motsvarande sambo-lag för homosexuella par. I dagsläget är det endast Albanien, Nordmakedonien, Bulgarien, Rumänien och Turkiet bland Nato-länderna som helt saknar juridiskt ”erkännande” av icke-heterosexuella relationer. Både Bulgarien och Kroatien definierar äktenskapet som ”en union som ingås mellan en man och en kvinna” i sina respektive konstitutioner, även om Kroatien trots detta tillåter registrerade ”partnerskap” bland homosexuella.

Lobbygrupper vill "bestraffa" olydiga Nato-länder internt

De Nato-länder som inte följer Natos ”värdegrund” blir samtidigt hårt ansatta för detta med jämna mellanrum, särskilt de länder som också har anslutit till EU. Den Nato-kopplade organisationen ATA, som leds av tidigare Nato-anställda, har till och med gått så långt att man publicerat en artikel där man kräver att Nato straffar medlemsländer som inte implementerar det man kallar för homosexuella och transpersoners ”rättigheter”. Specifikt har man pekat ut Ungern för att inte följa Natos ”värderingar”. I artikeln beklagar man sig över ungerska lagar som begränsar homolobbypropaganda:

Denna lag bryter inte bara mot mänskliga rättigheter, den går också mot Natos minimumkrav för medlemskap, vilka kräver att medlemsländer "upprätthåller demokrati, inklusive tolerans och mångfald" och behandlar minoriteter rättvist. Även om dessa krav för medlemskap inte är bindande bryter Ungerns agerande mot Natos jämställdhets- och mångfaldspolicy som förbjuder diskriminering baserad på sexuell läggning och kön. Nato behöver besvara dessa brott mot mänskliga rättigheter och diskriminering bland sina medlemsländer.

Nato avsätter inte bara en stor del av sin finansiering och sin personal för att propagera för ”mångfald och inkludering” – man gör det under täckmanteln att det är avgörande för krigsalliansens funktion och överlevnad och tillhandahåller bland annat officiella ”genusrådgivare” till högt uppsatta Nato-ledare.

Sverige som stat, och Försvarsmakten som militär organisation, har sedan länge inte bara accepterat dessa idéer utan implementerat dem fullt ut i sina verksamheter. På så sätt innebär inte ett Nato-medlemskap nödvändigtvis några kortsiktiga förändringar i dessa frågor från våra politiker och militära ledare.

Men genom ett Natomedlemskap integreras detta i ett globalt, militärt system som utgör ännu ett hinder för Sverige att gå en annan väg och bryta upp från den folk- och familjefientliga ideologi som förpestat våra institutioner. Detta innebär en militär ockupation av en Washingtonledd krigsallians som under 80 år använt sitt enorma våldskapital till att påtvinga hela världen sina människofientliga idéer.

Denna krigsallians har Sveriges politiker (inklusive riksdagens sverigedemokrater som många nationella röstade på) valt att tvinga på vårt land över folkets huvuden. De få gånger frågan om en folkomröstning lyftes i den offentliga debatten avfärdades detta som ”onödigt” eller till och med ”olämpligt” med hänvisning till ”det försämrade säkerhetsläget”.

Men även om en folkomröstning skulle ha hållits i Sverige har Nato-propagandan från samtliga medströmsmedier varit så kompakt att man troligtvis säkerställt att en majoritet av väljarna redan integrerat lögnen om att Nato är en garanti för vår säkerhet i sin egen världsbild.

Nato är en antivit, familjefientlig och kvinnofientlig organisation som inte bara måste hållas utanför Norden utan även stoppas.

https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution